post script:
the duck is safe and sound and reunited with her family/community. If only our compassion and empathy could save the rest of the world so quickly...
Sunday, June 14, 2009
a duck, stranded

Being woken in the morning by a duck in distress makes me think about how beings come into our lives, sometimes just for a moment, to wake us up. This duck has awakened so much empathy and compassion in me this morning. And she reminds me that all over the world, there are beings who are lost, or lonely, or stranded, or abandoned. I cannot physically save this duck. Nor can I physically save all the beings who are suffering. But I can hold them all in my heart. I can take a few moments to sit, close my eyes, and try to send my spirit out to them all, to help them and keep them safe from suffering. So please, take a moment, for all who are suffering, and for the duck.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
a radiant heart

It has been excellently said by the Teacher of Gods and Men that among all wealth, contentment is the best. So be fully content. If you know contentment, even if you possess no wealth, you’ll be perfectly rich.
– Arya Nagarjuna, Letter to a Friend
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
wait for it...

Thank you oh lice, for giving us this time together.
"Teach me your ways O Lord,
And I will walk in your path.
Give me an undivided heart,
And I will fear your name.
I will praise you,
O Lord my God, with all my heart;
I will glorify your name forever."
Psalm 86:11-1
Monday, June 1, 2009
choo on this

In law school, we learned the famous property adage, "possession is 9/10ths of the law." We could just as easily say "perception is 9/10ths of our reality." Is there any such thing as an objective perception? The dictionary defines "objectively" as: not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased. Further definitions are: intent upon or dealing with things external to the mind rather than with thoughts or feelings, as a person or a book; being the object of perception or thought; belonging to the object of thought rather than to the thinking subject. But take a moment and try to think about something without your personal feelings coloring your thoughts. Just try to separate yourself (the thinking subject) from the object you are thinking about. Since the object does not, in and of itself, possess any language with which to describe it, the mere use of language alone infuses your thoughts with your personal feelings. You look at an object and your dog looks at an object. You think "shoe;" your dog thinks "chew toy." Who is right and who is wrong? The answer to that question utterly depends on "personal feelings, interpretations and prejudices." This is not to say the shoe (or chew toy - depending on your point of view) isn't really there. An object is there. (Yoga Sutra 4.16) But it can't be thought about, i.e., interpreted, apart from thinker. There is nothing that "belongs to the object of thought" separate from the "thinking subject."
Is there something wrong with our perceptions? Usually not. The problem comes when we insist that we are objective, and believe that how we see things is how they really are. In Through the Looking Glass, Alice has the following dialogue with the Red Queen:
`Where do you come from?' said the Red Queen. `And where are you going? Look up, speak nicely, and don't twiddle your fingers all the time.'
Alice attended to all these directions, and explained, as well as she could, that she had lost her way.
`I don't know what you mean by your way,' said the Queen: `all the ways about here belong to me!"We are all like the Red Queen. We believe that our way is "The Way." So I will always see my daughters as angels. I'm glad I have the karmic seeds to see them this way. Just try to dissuade me!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)